DEVELOPMENT OF COLLABORATION IN THE ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES COURSES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1903311JAbstract
The mission of higher education institutions is to prepare future professionals for a rapidly changing labor market, yet what skills we teach students, and how we teach them, is highly problematic. The ability to collaborate is crucial for success in professional and academic endeavor; the challenge for foreign language educators is to shift the focus of courses in ways that address the development of collaboration skills. Yet, this also becomes a challenge in scholarly literature on English for Specific Purposes (ESP), since research in this field has been somewhat limited, i.e., most commonly it investigates collaborative writing as a way of developing collaboration. Furthermore, the explicit teaching of collaboration, as well as the inclusion of diverse tasks to enhance collaboration, are often neglected by researchers. Also neglected in this field of research are the challenges and opportunities that students experience while learning to collaborate during ESP classes. The paper aims at acquiring more in-depth insights into the phenomenon of collaboration during ESP classes to facilitate the practice of language educators who can no longer neglect the urgent need to develop collaboration through their classes. The authors of the paper, who were also the designers of ESP tasks, sought to develop collaboration skills by both engaging learners in collaborative tasks and integrating additional measures to address this skill. Qualitative data acquired via observations and semi-structured interviews revealed that such tasks could contribute to students’ overall performance to improve language proficiency because they enhance motivation and engagement. Apart from collaboration skills, they contribute to the development of many essential skills vital for engagement in the twenty-first century workplace. Notwithstanding, they pose challenges to students and this indicates the need for more frequent collaborative tasks and progress with additional measures that develop students’ collaboration abilities in higher education.
References
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book. Pearson Education.
Cammarata, L., Tedick, D. J. & Osborn, T. A. (2016). Content-Based Instruction and Curricular Reforms: Issues and Goals. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 1-22). NY and London: Routledge.
Chen, R. & Hird, B. (2006). How do Chinese students collaborate in EFL group work? Prospect, 21(2), 70-81.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (2017). The nature of problem solving. OECD.
Fernández, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Re-conceptualizing "scaffolding" and the Zone of Proximal Development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 50(1), 40–54.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
Häkkinen, P., Arvaja, M., & Mäkitalo, K. (2004). Prerequisites for CSCL: Research approaches, methodological challenges and pedagogical development. In K. Littleton, D. Faulkner & D. Miell (Eds.), Learning to collaborate and collaborating to learn (pp. 161–175). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25-41.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer.
Hung, W. (2013). Conceptualizing problems in problem-based learning. In J.M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, S. Smaldino, & M. Herring (Eds.), Learning, problem solving, and mindtools: Essays in honor of David H. Jonassen (pp. 174–194). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. NY and London: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. & Land, S. (Eds.). (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. NY and London: Routledge.
Juceviciene, P., & Vizgirdaite, J. (2012). Educational empowerment of collaborative learning at the University. Social Sciences, 75(1), 41-51.
Lai, E., DiCerbo, K., & Foltz, P. (20 17). Skills for today: What we know about teaching and assessing collaboration [White paper]. London: Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/Skills_For_Today_Series-Pearson/Collaboration_White_Paper_FINAL.pdf
Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2011). A brief study of reticence in ESL class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(8), 961-965.
Mercer, N. (2002). Developing dialogues. In Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (Eds) Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Learning for Life in the 21st Century (pp. 141-154). Blackwell, Oxford.
Mercer, N. (2009). Developing argumentation: Lessons learned in the primary school. In Muller Mirza and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 177-194). Springer International Publishing.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2012). Discuss, reflect, and collaborate: A qualitative analysis of forum, blog, and wiki use in an EFL blended learning course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 146-152.
Newman, J. H. (1889). The Idea of a University. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Piccardo, E. (2014). From communicative to action-oriented: A research pathway. Curriculum Services, Canada. Retrieved from https://transformingfsl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/TAGGED_DOCUMENT_CSC605_Research_Guide_English_01.pdf
Piccardo, E., & North, B. (2019). The action-oriented approach: a dynamic vision of language education. Multilingual Matters Limited.
Prichard, J. S., Stratford, R. J., & Bizo, L. A. (2006). Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 256–265.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-Century Skills Requires 21st-Century Teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195–229.
Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. Arecls, 5, 244-262.
Vizgirdaitė, J. (2013). Educational empowerment of student collaborative learning in the university studies. (Doctoral dissertation, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania).
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MA.
Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: a new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499-512.
Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. (2011). Using the interactive whiteboard to scaffold pupils’ learning of science in collaborative group activity, presented at 14th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Exeter, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-the-interactive-whiteboard-to-scaffold-pupils-Warwick-Mercer/76ebad39cc295fecf62292e2ce9c81c52702646
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth revolution (Global Challenge Insight Report). Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
