MEASURING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN A GRAMMAR-LED GENERAL ENGLISH COURSE AT A TERTIARY EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Authors

  • Maria Eugenia Zevallos Valdivia Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima - Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231009018Z

Abstract

With the need for instant communication and the boom of the digital era, quality content concerning grammatical output by language learners has become a hot issue among teachers, particularly university professors who aim at accuracy when dealing with their students’ production. The purpose of this study was to measure the effectiveness of a remedial grammar course created “ad hoc” for university leavers (n = 987) in Lima, Peru between March 2018 and September 2019. The dataset deployed in the study came from two instruments: Pre-Test and Post-Test, applied to participants at the start and end of every term. When processing the data, the difference of the paired samples did not follow a normal distribution, therefore, the t-student test could not be applied. Alternatively, the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test had to be used, but only after verifying the assumption that the differences between post and pre-test samples followed a symmetric distribution. The test result yielded a very significant p-value, thus rejecting the null hypothesis that there were no differences regarding median grades between the pre- and post-tests. Furthermore, the effect size of nearly 70% confirmed the effectiveness of the grammar course and the appropriacy of the application of teaching and assessment methods.

Author Biography

  • Maria Eugenia Zevallos Valdivia, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima - Perú

    PhD Ed, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru

    MA Ed, Universidad de Piura, Peru

    MBA, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico

    BA Ed, Universidad de Piura, Peru

    Royal Society of Arts DELTA, UK

    Royal Society of Arts CELTA, UK

    Cambridge Exam in English for Language Teachers - Level 2 (CEELT-2), UK

References

Ausubel, David. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963.

Bilash, Olenka. Inductive and Deductive Instruction. Alberta: Saskatchewan Education, 2009.

Bloom, Benjamin. S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.

Brown, H. Douglas. Strategies for Success: A Practical Guide to Learning English. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc., 2002.

Brumfit, Christopher. Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Celce-Murcia, Marianne. and Diane Larsen-Freeman. The Grammar Book: An ESL Teacher's Course (2nd ed). Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.

Dörnyei, Zoltan. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, 2005.

Ellis, Rod. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Ellis, Rod. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Farrell, Thomas S.C. and Particia, Lim Poh Choo. “Conceptions of Grammar Teaching: A case study of Teachers' Beliefs and Classroom Practices.” TESL-EJ 9/2 (2005): pp. 1-13.

Gayane, R. Hovhannisyan. “Acquisition of Language Meanings Via Smart Technologies.” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes (2016): Vol. 4, No 1, pp. 23-37.

Harmer, Jeremy. Teaching and Learning Grammar. London: Longman, 1989.

Kayaoğlu, Mustafa N., Akbaş, Raşide D., and Erbay, Sakire. “The Role of Web-based Grammar Instruction in Tertiary Level EFL Students’ Academic Achievement.” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes (2015): Vol. 3, No 3, pp. 499-507.

Krashen, Stephen., and Marianne Nikolov. (1997). “Need we sacrifice accuracy for fluency?” System (1997): Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 197-201.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mohammad M. Obeidat, and Moh’d A. Alomari. “The Effect of Inductive and Deductive Teaching on EFL Undergraduates' Achievement in Grammar at the Hashemite University in Jordan,” International Journal of Higher Education, 25 February 2020, https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/17312/10712 (7 September 2023).

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Longman.

Richards, Jack C., and Theodore Rodgers. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Singleton, David M., and Zsolt Lengyel. The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition: A critical Look at the Critical Period Hypothesis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1995.

Skehan, Peter. Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. Oxford: Heinemann, 1996.

Thomas, Earl W. A Comparison of Inductive and Deductive Teaching Methods in College Freshman Remedial English. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania, 1970.

Williams, James D. The Teacher’s Grammar Book (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.

Zevallos, Maria Eugenia. “Método Predictivo Para Comprobar la Efectividad de la Enseñanza de la Gramática en un Curso Remedial de Inglés en una Universidad Peruana,” Revista Igobernanza, 22 marzo 2022, https://www.igobernanza.org/index.php/IGOB/article/view/180 (18 julio 2023).

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-04-17

Issue

Section

Articles